This type of action occurs all the time and considers the situation when the lawyer neglect its client rights in providing him a suitable legal help. These situations usually are when lawyer misses some dead line or he doesn’t fill documentation in the right way or acts without clients’ agreement. Legal malpractice lawyers can represent you on the court against your former lawyer if you think that your rights have been neglected and that he caused you a damage. In this case it must be proved on court that other lawyer didn’t shown off his skills and care that were expected from him in similar situations.
Legal malpractice claim can result with this mistakes:
When a lawyer doesn’t know his area of the law well, when an investigation is inappropriate or when he misses the dead line, when he has conflict of interests or when he shows some mistakes or omissions and the court dismisses the lawsuit. Legal malpractice can also be: when lawyer execute some payment fraud, or when he gives inadequate legal advice, or when he shows dishonesty, or when he breaches your trust, when he obstructs the justice, or when he fails to give proper information to client and gets its consent and at the end when he doesn’t follow instructions from a client.
Understanding Legal Malpractice
Typical situations when you have to prove legal malpractice:
First you have to prove that there was a relationship between a lawyer and a client, even when lawyer wasn’t paid for his services, the client was counting on his legal advice.
You have to prove dereliction in the legal representation of the prosecutor.
When his carelessness causes you any kind of damage or cause you some injury.
You must prove the fact and the content of the damage.
After the court approves the relationship between client-attorney you must determine the “standard of care” and prove that your former attorney violated this standard. Later you must present your damage as a result of your lawyers’ misconduct. And at the end you must prove that harm was done as a result of legal malpractice and you must demonstrate the nature and the size of those damages. For more information feel free to contact website over here. Read More
The most comprehensive attempt to shape the legal fight against cyber-crime at the international level is certainly a Council of Europe Convention from 2001. It contains the substantive and procedural criminal provisions which could lead to the implementation of the national legislation of the States Parties, it should achieve a high degree of harmonization of different legislations, and to accelerate and qualitatively improve international cooperation in the fight against cybercrime. The fact that the signatory countries and certain countries that are not members of the Council of Europe, indicate how important this piece of legislation is and what the expectations are to make a big step forward in fighting this type of crime. For more information follow this link.
The Convention defines nine offenses that are classified into four groups. Criminal offenses against the confidentiality, integrity and availability of computer data and systems (Illegal access, illegal interception, data obstruction, interference system, misuse of devices), crimes related to computers (counterfeiting in connection with computers, scams that are related to computers), crimes related to the content (offenses related to child pornography), and offenses related to copyright and others related rights.
The provisions of the Convention procedural nature are related to: an expedited preservation of stored computer data (Article 16), expeditious preservation and protection and partial disclosure of the transfer (Article 17), the issuance of a lecture computer data ( Article 18 ) , search and seizure of stored computer data ( Article 19 ), gather information on traffic data at the moment of their creation (article 20), interception of data contained in the content of electronic communications (Article 21) as well as on the issue of jurisdiction (Article 22) for the prosecution of perpetrators of criminal offenses that are prescribed by the Convention.
The Convention defines the general principles on which the international cooperation rests, through agreements concluded on the basis of equal or reciprocal legislation, and in accordance with national laws, for the purpose of investigations or proceedings related to criminal offenses and related to computer systems and data, or for the purpose of gathering evidence in electronic form. Read More
Identity Theft is shape of the fraud that represents the false representation of another person in the purpose of acquiring the material means or other benefits. This crime is punishable by the law and depending on the type of the fraud the sentence will be determined. Identity theft wasn’t recognized as a crime till the 1998, when Congress made that act and named it as a federal crime.
This crime refers to transfer or use of any kind of identification means of another person, without its consent, in purpose of gaining a financial means or to commit some kind of a crime. If a person commits this kind of a violation, he will be punished according to Federal law.
Identity theft refers to four things.
When a person is a victim of stolen identity, it doesn’t represent the same thing when their money is stolen and credit card raided. The law makes difference between these two things. In the second case when the money is lost, the state puts accent on bank rather than individuals.
The state founded special institution where identity theft can be reported. The institution takes its job very seriously and resolves cases with high efficiency. The main body of federal government that resolves cases of identity theft is called Federal Trade Commission, and all of the cases of identity theft can be reported here.
State also included higher penalties for identity theft. The highest penalty for this type of a crime is 15 years of prison and very big fines.
Improvement of this law closed all loopholes that previous one had. The previous law didn’t include identity theft as a crime, only possession of false documents and their making was considered as a violation of the law. Most of these violations are prosecuted on state level and state started passing the law that will help the victims. Read More